Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

International groups --- Europe --- International agencies --- Organisations internationales --- Politics and government --- Politique et gouvernement --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- #SBIB:012.IEB --- -International agencies --- -Associations, International --- IGOs (Intergovernmental organizations) --- Institutions, International --- Intergovernmental organizations --- International administration --- International associations --- International governmental organizations --- International institutions --- International organizations --- International unions --- Organizations, International --- Specialized agencies of the United Nations --- International cooperation --- Interorganizational relations --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- International organization --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- -Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- 1989 --- -Europe - Politics and government - 1989 --- -Europe --- -International groups --- Europe - Politics and government - 1989-

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The attacks of September 11 2001 spectacularly demonstrated that America’s main security challenges did not stem from traditional power rivalries but rather from ‘grey areas’, failed or badly governed states which are breeding grounds for extremism. Today the emphasis has shifted from focusing on relations between states to acting directly on states themselves, so as to pre-empt the growth of terrorism, arms proliferation, genocide, civil wars etc. After the concept of the ‘global war on terror’, President George W. Bush put forward his ‘freedom agenda’ aiming to promote democracy as a response to the security challenges facing the world, in particular in the Middle East. But overthrowing tyrants and holding elections is not enough to create a stable and well-governed democracy and can even, in some cases, complicate matters, as events between 2003 and 2005 in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Palestinian Authority and Egypt have shown. This is where ‘transformational diplomacy’, the concept inaug-urated by Condoleezza Rice in early 2006, comes in. Basically this consists in working with the partners of the United States with a view to ‘build and sustain democratic, well-governed states that will respond to the needs of their people and conduct themselves responsibly in the international system.’ To enable this to happen, it is first of all American diplomacy which must transform itself, so as to become less ‘analytical’ and more operational, characterised by direct involvement in foreign societies rather than just being restricted to the realm of foreign policy. This Chaillot Paper explores the scope and limits of this ‘transformative’ action: is the realist paradigm, that of interpower rivalries, really no longer relevant ? Can diplomats transform themselves into active promoters of good governance ? Are other countries ready to accept them in this role, or will they accuse them of interference ? Can transformational diplomacy really change the world ?

Security, International --- Sécurité internationale --- United States --- Etats-Unis --- Foreign relations --- Relations extérieures --- #SBIB:327.5H00 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- #SBIB:327H15 --- Strategie en vredesonderzoek: algemeen --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Buitenlandse politiek: Noord-Amerika --- Sécurité internationale --- Relations extérieures

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Diplomates --- Diplomatie --- Union européenne --- Relations extérieures --- Europe --- Unité --- #SBIB:327.7H233 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- Europese Unie: externe relaties, buitenlands- en defensiebeleid (ook WEU) --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Diplomats --- European Union countries --- Foreign relations administration. --- Diplomatie. --- Unité. --- Relations extérieures. --- Union européenne --- Relations extérieures. --- Unité.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

International economic relations --- Russian Federation --- Russia (Federation) --- Russie --- Foreign relations. --- Relations extérieures --- Foreign relations --- #SBIB:328H262 --- #SBIB:327H13 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- Instellingen en beleid: Rusland en het GOS --- Buitenlandse politiek: U.S.S.R. / GOS / Russische Federatie --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- -Russia (Federation) --- Russia & Former Soviet Republics --- Regions & Countries - Europe --- History & Archaeology --- -Foreign relations --- Russia --- Relations extérieures --- Russia (Federation) - Foreign relations

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Coexistence --- Coëxistence pacifique --- Diplomacy --- Diplomatie --- Foreign affairs --- Foreign policy --- Interdependence of nations --- International relations --- Internationale betrekkingen --- Ordre mondial --- Peaceful coexistence --- Relations internationales --- Vreedzame coëxistentie --- Wereldorde --- World order --- Diplomacy. --- International relations. --- #SBIB:001.AANKOOP --- #SBIB:327.5H20 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- Foreign relations --- Global governance --- International affairs --- Vredesonderzoek: algemeen --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- National security --- Sovereignty --- World politics --- History